Densery
Audit-trail explorerPick any field. Ask the question an examiner asks.
Three document types, processed by Densery. Click any highlighted value and walk the decision all the way back — which page it came from, which model read it, what confidence it carried, which rule judged it, who signed it, and what was written into the system of record. Two fields on this page failed and went to a human. Those are the ones worth clicking.
No form · No email · Nothing transmitted
Choose a file
The red ones did not clear their confidence threshold and stopped for a human.
Click any of them.
What this is demonstrating
Reading the document is layer one, and it is close to free — open-weight models now do it locally for cents per thousand pages. We are not asking you to be impressed that the value was extracted. We are asking you to notice that six months from now, when someone asks why a file was closed, this record exists without anyone having assembled it.
The interesting fields are the ones that did not work.
Any vendor will show you a clean extraction. The question a risk committee actually asks is what happens on the file where the machine was unsure — and whether you can tell the difference between a value the model read correctly and one it guessed.
- Silent degradation is the dangerous failure.A tool that reads a photocopied appraisal badly and reports no error forces a human to re-check everything, and the automation saves nothing.
- A confidence score is only useful if it routes.Below threshold, the file stops, goes to a named person with the source page attached, and waits. It does not proceed with a guess.
- The override is evidence too.What the machine proposed, what the human changed it to, who they were and when — recorded as part of the same trace, not in a separate ticketing system.
- The correction has to change the next run.Otherwise accuracy flatlines at whatever generic quality you bought. Click the red fields and follow the last step.
This is a demonstration. Yours would use your documents.
The three files above are constructed samples, not customer data — nothing on this page came out of a real institution, and the field values are invented. What is real is the structure of the record: the seven steps, the confidence routing, the named approver and the correction loop are what the banking deployment produces on every file it touches.
Once we are working together, you get the same explorer pointed at your own files and your own estate. Thirty minutes is enough to see whether that is worth having.
The export
What an examiner receives
- The full trace for any file or date range, as a signed export
- Model and ontology version pinned per decision, so an old file is explained by the rules in force at the time
- Every human override with the reviewer's identity and timestamp
- Threshold and policy change history, with who approved each change
Thirty minutes with Densery.
Tell us about the work you want an agent to finish. We listen first, then show you the platform and the case that is closest to yours. This is a working session, not a sales pitch.